New Stuff

IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT KIM GENTES MOVIE REVIEWS

The appearance of a movie in this review journal does not mean that the movie is endorsed by Kim.  He writes reviews of movies that he saw that he recommends people avoid as well as movies that he considers worth seeing.  Aside from just critical approval regarding the film, some movies may not be suitable for you or your family.  You must make that kind of determination on your own, and stay true to your own convictions on what is appropriate to see.  Some movies are well made, but have offensive or difficult subject matter that is questionable to many viewers. Again, the reviews listed here should not be your only filter for whether or not a film is appropriate for you and and your family.

Additionally, Kim has his own view on what movies are and why he thinks they are a worthwhile aspect of current culture to be investigated.  You certainly don't have to agree with Kim on his viewpoints of movies, and he would be surprised if you did.

Kim's thoughts on movies -

Movies are the modern art "experience" of our culture. They are transmitted in many forms, on screens in theatres, DVDs, television and even computers. They are the merge of classical theatrical acting and modern day technical set and experience creation (effects). The reason I enjoy and watch lots of movies is that they not only entertain, they communicate the nuances of our society. Of course, some have nothing to do with culture, its just greedy corporations trying to produce profits. I am a guy, and as such am not the ideal audience for romantic comedies or 'chick fliks'. However I am also a husband, and domestic bliss (as well as common sense) compels me to at least review them...occasionally.  For the most part, you will find I like (and therefor review a lot of ) action, drama, science fiction, suspense and similarly themed movies.

Madagascar (2005)

madagascar_releaseposter.jpgAmusing, liked by kids... but average film

Overall Grade:C
Story:C-
Acting:C
Direction:B-
Visuals:C

Over the years, we have enjoyed family movie after movie in which animation experts have amazed us with visuals that rivet the edge of expectations, and dialog that engages young and old alike. The Lion King, Toy Story (and the sequel), Bugs Life, The Emporers New Groove, Shrek (and 2, too), Chicken Run, Find Nemo and the Incredibles are the highlights of a list of animation films that have took aim at its duel composition audience of children and their parents. Creating stimulating visuals that amaze and captivate the children, along with slapstick and catch-word humor for the kids, Disney, Pixar & Dreamworks have found a way to make the children laugh. All the while, another layer of dialog and action (through puns and nuance) began to immerse the parents with funny sitcom-esque humor. This has been done successfully so many times now (siting my list of movies above as proof), the expectation of the families going to heavy-hyped animated films today is very high. Enter "Madagascar".

This new feature length cartoon by Dreamworks is just that, a cartoon. Intentionally flattening the visuals for a more "cartoon" look, the film is not as stunning as other 3D wonders like Shrek, Finding Nemo or even Toy Story, and aims at a retro feel to comfort parents with the subtle change back to a more 2D world. The problem is, it didn't work. Not because of the visual change, but because the film not only acquired the "cartoon" look, its writing also harkened back to one-level dialog and action. Even this would have worked, if the directors and writers knew which audience they were targeting, but as the movie rolls on, its apparant they don't.

Some scenes are pure eye candy, with lots of hitting and falling down, laughing and child-like chuckling. It is fun, but clearly meant for the kids. The next scene is completely adult level dialog with the little ones in the theatre looking like they are listening to a lecture on quantum physics. And the jaunt continues through the entire film. Really in no part of the film does the writing manage to speak to both the kids and children at the same time. And this is dissappointing, because the story is actually quite good. I went to this movie with my kids and they clearly liked the slapstick and catch-phrase humor. But with just days later, the usual mimicking of key scenes, and trailer phrases are all but gone from their memories. They liked the moment, but weren't rivetted by it, which is unusual for a top hyped animation film in a summer.

With equal ambivalence, my wife and I enjoyed the film, but were not sad to see it end. In the end, this film needed better writing to be a blockbuster kids/family movie. It failed to grab and hold our attention with an engaging story (such as and epic like Lion King). It failed to amuse much longer than a few seconds. The visuals while a nice reprieve to simpler dimensions, didn't hold the film. And the music was pretty much non existant save a single song of humor by the forest of leaping lemurs on the namesake island of the film, Madagascar.

While no one in your family will hate you for going to this movie, none of you will remember much of it in a week either. While still the best children/family film yet to release this summer, that is not saying much since this is in a category with not much other attractions coming this season. My advice- wait for DVD or rental on this one. If you are having a simply boring Saturday and want to go to a movie, be sure to go to the matinee showing, so at least you will save a little on the entry fees. I am sure I will be hated by many for dissing a good kids animation film, but this flick is simply mediocre- nothing more, nothing less.

Batman Begins (2005)

batmanbegins_boxart.jpgFinally, someone gets Batman right!

Overall Grade:A-
Story:A
Acting:A
Direction:A-
Visuals:B+


Batman. A true representation of him has been as illusive on the silver screen as the the darknight detective was the criminals and crime lords of Gotham. Previous movies lacked the subtle power, humanity or vigilant nature of the Batman character that is the lore of comic book fame for decades. I grew up a DC comic buff, and Batman was the one "Marvel-esque" character that fit that unique space between reality and myth- a character that had not special powers, but reached beyond his humanity to become something more than a man. A legend.

And this is the way this movie begins, with the history and ideology clearly explained. Instead of rushing into battle against one mindless idiodic foe after another, this Batman is a true character with a real story to tell. And if you are steeped in Batman lore, then what can I say? Welcome Home!

Christopher Nolan directs a near perfect rendition of Gotham's caped crusader, faulting only with a slight misgiving on the villian portrayals that take rise in the last 1/3 of the movie. But that is small err when you look at the complete treatment that this Batman gets.

Batman himself is played by Christian Bale, who is the perfect balance of human and revenge. Not nearly as cold and empty as previous attempts, he outlasts even Michael Keaton as the best Batman & Bruce Wayne yet put to film. Batman was, at the core, a person conflicted by the desire to avenge his parents death to the a vast criminal plague in the city of Gotham and his own personal desire to see justice and not vengence have its reign in bringing evil to halt. The past attempts at his character have made him to cold or too untormented and emotionally lackluster. Bale balances the two souls of Batman and Bruce Wayne with his own sense of balance, and it works perfectly.

Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman and Katie Holmes make the perfect supporting cast for the Batman. The criminals were also presented with much more humanity than previous super-psycho larks that had neither realism or escapism for the moviegoer. The crime lord boss, the psychotic psychiatrist and the ninja master all have actually human-like qualities here, and one actually feels compelled to geniunely believe and dislike them. The only thing that weighed slightly less than the rest was the league of shadow characters, who really become slightly over-the-top with a "destroy the city for the good of mankind mantra". It's not a big deal, but it betrays the true Batman story and isn't what you look for when cannon is going to screen.

The action itself is excellent. Effects don't overload the scenes, but tension holds the mystery of Batman in concise sway. You feel like this is a Batman battle, with fear and surprise lurking around every corner. Sure there are great martial arts scenes once the Darknight detective has opened up the battle, but the nuances of his arrival and dismantling of the enemy is enjoyable and genuine.

Thankfully, we aren't treated to a smattering of useless romance in this film. It is a comic book hero film, about the birthing of a legend, not a romance novel. This is where far too many action movies go awry- inserting the obligatory love interest to keep the ladies watching the film. While miss Holmes does well as the love interest for sure, they don't play to that, and the protagonist isn't twisted and forced to deciding between his dedication to his role as Batman and his hope of relationship with the lady. Now that the Batman Begins has played the important role of defining the character, later movies would do well to build on the theme, and then romance is a reasonable outgrowth of the plot.

The movie will be too dark and violent for children under 13, but there is not an huge amount of scare tactics on this film. The few scenes of drug induced psychosis, where people appear demonized to the viewers will be too frightful for children under 13, but save those scenes you have a violent, but viewable movie for ages 10 and up.

If you have never seen a Batman movie, this is the one! If you are you true Batman fan and have been waiting for someone to finally get it right, then welcome home my friend, because here: Batman Begins!

Sahara (2005)

sahara_releaseposter.jpgSurprise! it isn't lame

Overall Grade:C
Story:C+
Acting:C
Direction:C-
Visuals:C


Mathew McConnahey or whatever... he kinda bugs me as an actor.. he just seems weird to me.. anyways.. I was thinking I would not like this film. In fact, I wasn't planning on seeing it, but got to theatre and our date night needed a film. It was all that was available. So we saw it.

The film actually turned out to be quite a fun little jaunt through Africa. It was surprising to me that the story had some cool worldwide "outbreak" sickness groove in it. And, it actually included some cool action scenes and detective work.

Well, you will enjoy the humor in this one as much as the action. None of it was memorable, but all of it was reasonable and watchable. Good DVD rental for sure. But don't bank this for anything close to an epic.

 

Monster-in-Law (2005)

monsterinlaw_releaseposter.jpgIt's funny, but whatever...

Overall Grade:C-
Story:D-
Acting:B-
Direction:C-
Visuals:C

I can't be too contraversial with this film. It was funny and Fonda does a very good job with the mother-in-law stint. I have to say that I have never been a J-Lo movie fan, and was looking forward to hating another one of her films here. But she is slowly becoming an actress (hey after millions of dollars on lame films, you'd think she would eventually learn, so maybe she is). I actually liked her character and her attempts at engaging herself in the role- a sharp contrast from her other films.

Overall, I liked what was attempted in this film. And overall, it was a mediocre attempt, that resulted in a slightly disappointing comedy. I think it had some funny moments, but at the expense of mind-numbing time to set up the jokes and really tired characatures of the perfect and beautiful fiance, rich eligible doctor, angry mother-in-law, and even the gay friend next door.

Why, oh why do we have to make movies with people that don't actually exist in real life. When was the last time you met any of those folks? Like never. It would be nice if a comedy actually started with real people once in a while, and relied on actual acting and script to develop the humor, rather than sad exaggerations of people juxtaposed to other sad exaggerations of people. Gag me with an authentic Martha Stewart approved measuring spoon.

Still, the movie didn't completely flop, and as I said, J-Lo makes her first real hay as a film star. You probably will end up seeing this with the girl friend, and you won't hate yourself afterwards, plus you will chuckle a time or two during the movie. Hey, like my dad used to say, that is better than kick in the pants with a frozen rig boot (for those who didn't grow up in oil-country, that is a steel toed boot used, often, for working on oil rigs).

The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants (2005)

thesisterhoodofthetravelingpants_releaseposter.jpgComplete and total blathering dung

Overall Grade:F
Story:F
Acting:F+
Direction:F-
Visuals:D

One would like to see a movie. This would not be it. If you value your sanity, your honesty, your valor and your humanity, stay away from this type of drivel. All that can happen possibly good from this sad film (and its genre of so called movies) is that the public finally gets so sick of it, that they lose money and Hollywood stops making this junk.

Run, don't walk, when you see any mention or possibility of having to see this.

I say nothing about content because there is nothing worthy to say.

Die, evil movies! Die!