Kim Gentes

Saint Teresa of Avila is another of the Catholic mystics who has profoundly impacted Christian formation/spirituality in the last 500 years. Like Therese of Lisieux, St. John of the Cross and others in the mystic tradition, Teresa of Avila takes a route of growth that focuses profoundly on the topic of love and uses the lens of introspection to probe the depths of the soul to find and purge inconsistencies for the person to find ultimate union with God.

To begin down this path Teresa defines an expanded understanding of the soul as a philosophically different and complete component to a human being, much in the Platonic/Geek dualistic model of separated body/spirit. Her exploration of this soul description begins with its magnitude.

In speaking of the soul we must always think of it as spacious, ample and lofty; and this can be done without the least exaggeration, for the soul's capacity is much greater than we can realize, and this Sun, Which is in the palace, reaches every part of it.[1]

But within this Platonic construct, the imagery and understanding of the soul is quite articulate and helpful. Teresa jumps immediately into the examination of the inner self.  She finds in this inward journey, a more careful examination of the human condition, both as broken and beautiful agencies to the purpose of God. Again of this inward reflection, she says:

self-knowledge is so important that, even if you were raised right up to the heavens, I should like you never to relax your cultivation of it; so long as we are on this earth, nothing matters more to us than humility. And so I repeat that it is a very good thing -- excellent, indeed -- to begin by entering the room where humility is acquired rather than by flying off to the other rooms. For that is the way to make progress, and, if we have a safe, level road to walk along, why should we desire wings to fly? Let us rather try to get the greatest possible profit out of walking. As I see it, we shall never succeed in knowing ourselves unless we seek to know God: let us think of His greatness and then come back to our own baseness; by looking at His purity we shall see our foulness; by meditating upon His humility, we shall see how far we are from being humble.[2]

Teresa begins with the assumption that self-investigation is actually a way of expressing humility, since we are changed when we see the contrast between ourselves and God, our nature and God’s nature.  In fact, for Teresa of Avila, humility is acquired by self-knowledge. For most individuals in modern culture, this type of approach would seem more selfish and less apt for personal change. But this is the gift of the mystic writers - they actually become the true inquisitors of their own hearts, who deal in honestly and expect you will as well. 

What develops in this book particularly is a description of the soul as a series of unique mansions within mansions (something like a Russian doll configuration). The initial exterior mansions are representative of lesser levels of union with God, fraught with sin and seemingly regularly pulling people back to a starting of spiritual development largely due to a lack of freedom from sin and a continued unhealthy self-absorption. The interior mansions also correlate with levels of prayer progress that the adherent makes as they manage through these levels of mansions.

What anchors the mystics insistence on self-knowledge as a path to purity is their equally consistent trajectory of faith founded deeply in love. Love is the lynch-pin, the catalyst and end game for every point and sub-point of The Interior Castle, and the Avila saint says as much: 

As I have written about this at great length elsewhere,I will not repeat it here. I only want you to be warned that, if you would progress a long way on this road and ascend to the Mansions of your desire, the important thing is not to think much, but to love much; do, then, whatever most arouses you to love. Perhaps we do not know what love is: it would not surprise me a great deal to learn this, for love consists, not in the extent of our happiness, but in the firmness of our determination to try to please God in everything, and to endeavour, in all possible ways, not to offend Him, and to pray Him ever to advance the honour and glory of His Son and the growth of the Catholic Church. Those are the signs of love; do not imagine that the important thing is never to be thinking of anything else and that if your mind becomes slightly distracted all is lost.[3]

If there is any problem with the approach of the saint of Avila, it is not in the sincerity of her heart or the assumption that she puts forth that we should have likewise. Instead, it may be simply in the belief that such great wisdom can be birthed from a person living a life in the convents and taken for use among people who live daily in the strain and grime of broken humanity as it exists outside of the cloistered communities of the monastic traditions.

Product Link on Amazon: The Interior Castle

Review by Kim Gentes

[1]Therese of Avila,  “The Interior Castle”, translated E. Allison Peers (Radford, VA: Wilder Publications, 2008),Kindle Edition, Location 495

[2]Ibid., Location 509

[3]Ibid., Location 988

Bonaventure is a collection of the namesake saint’s most prized writings. It includes his two well read treatise The Soul’s Journey into God and The Tree of Life, as well as the officially commissioned (by the Church) biography of  Saint Francis of Assisi called The Life of St. Francis.

His most well known work, The Soul’s Journey into God, is a fusion of mystical interpretation of biblical allegory and “Augustine”-like logical thought.  Typical of these writings, the entire text is constant dissection from major point to minor point, back to major point- always trying to draw an outline of grand understanding rather than tell a coherent story.  The treatise starts with the physical/natural aspects of human existence, the natural weakness and frailty of man with its goal is lead you through a progression that will consummate in ultimate union with God. Bonaventure sees this as a progressive work that involves “levels” or stages of reflection and contemplation. You move from infant to maturity, eventually reaching ecstasy with God.

The Tree of Life follows a more clear storyline- in that it chronologically restates the life of Christ- but it is merely using that story arc to articulate the contemplative interpretation of Christ’s life as allegory.  With the cross of Christ being a tree of life, the stages of Christ’s life are explored as various fruits from his character, which hang on three main branches of the perfect life- His original (life before the Cross), His passion (the trials and crucifixion), and His glorification. Bonaventure uses less logical arguments than The Soul’s Journey into God, but he ultimately relies on much more recognizable components of Christ’s life to pin his thesis to, even if it is (The Soul’s Journey into God) largely based on allegory, as well.

My favorite work in this book, however, is the Life Of Saint Francis, which uses Bonaventure's skill as a communicator to convey the biography of the venerable saint Francis. Some points of the book are so gushing with praise of Francis, the writing loses credibility, though not elegance. But the longer you read, the more you become enraptured with Bonaventure into the life of Francis. By the end of Francis biography, you are fully immersed in the teachings and practice of Francis, and thus, you believe the miracles, the stories, and the accounts of his wisdom and greatness. Even in Francis death, he comes to prove Bonaventure’s writings we saw in both The Soul’s Journey into God and The Tree of Life by describing a man who enters into complete union with God, both by his ardent contemplation and fervent practice (especially of poverty). This union becomes not only an example, but almost another Christological event, as Francis “becomes” Christ as the first one to record receiving the sign of the stigmata.

A powerful quote that inspired me in The Tree of Life is:

O hard heart,
insane and impious,
to be pitied as if bereft of true life,
why do you rejoice and laugh
like a madman
in the midst of such misery
while the Wisdom of the Father
weeps over you?
Consider your weeping physician and
make mourning as for an only son,
a bitter lamentation;
let tears stream down
like a torrent
day and night.
Give yourself no rest,
nor let the pupil of your eye be still.[1]

 This particular point was a profound revelation to me. It was the best articulation I found for the difference between Francis and the early ascetics:

When they arrived at the valley of Spoleto full of their holy plans, they began to discuss whether they should live among the people or go off into places of solitude. But Christ's servant Francis did not place his trust in his own efforts or those of his companions; rather he sought to discern God's will in this matter by earnest prayer. Then, enlightened by a revelation from heaven, he realized that he was sent by the Lord to .. win for Christ the souls which the devil was trying to snatch away. Therefore he chose to live for all men rather than for himself alone, drawn by the example of the one who deigned to die for all (2 Cor. 5 :15).[2]

 In this last sentence we see the absolute brilliance of Francis, and the astuteness of Bonaventure for articulating it. His work of poverty, asceticism and self-discipline was not the isolated ascension to God that the desert Fathers espoused through their monastic model. Instead his asceticism was placed inside the community (instead of away from it) because he said “he chose to live for all men rather than for himself alone”.  In my estimation, this is the most brilliant accomplishment of St. Francis, and revealed by Bonaventure.

Product Link : Bonaventure: The Soul's Journey into God, the Tree of Life, the Life of St. Francis (The Classics of Western Spirituality)

Review by Kim Gentes

[1]St. Bonaventure, “Bonaventure: The Soul’s Journey into God; The Tree of Life; The Life of St. Francis”, (Mahwah, NJ:Paulist Press, 1978), Pg 137
[2]Ibid., Pg 208

Francis and Clare: the Complete Works contains the library of writings from Saint Francis of Assisi and his female protege Saint Clare of Assisi.  Francis writings range from his mystical understandings of Christ’s humanity and God’s nature (and their poetic renderings) to his practical Rules, and Testament, which details how life is to be lived by those who followed his way of life in the Order.  Clare’s writing, is more terse and compact, and you can see it has synthesized the teachings of Francis to an even more focused agenda than himself. Clare seems to be a more skilled writer, or at least more poignant.

Both Francis and Clare articulate the need to require others, through their writings, to ascend to Christ through and imitation of his life of poverty and suffering. Francis, even in his poetic writing, seems to have a fascination with praise and singing, even in his death. Clare seems to requite the same kinds of things as less than noble for the serious mind set on Christ. He seems raw and lost in his bodily and spiritual union with God, through his physical suffering coupled with his demanding attention to detail that was still always tempered with a joyous tone towards God’s goodness.  Clare’s words are more requesting and with an air of entreatment that seems appropriate for nobility. This might perhaps have been because much of her writing was, in fact, directed to nobility in her letters to Agnes of Prague.

This quote from Francis absolutely inspires me:

1. You are holy, Lord, the only God, You do Wonders.
2. You are strong, You are great, You are the most high, You are the almighty King. You, Holy Father, the King of heaven and earth.
3. You are Three and One, Lord God of gods;
You are good, all good, the highest good,
Lord, God, living and true.
4. You are love, charity.
You are wisdom; You are humility; You are patience;
You are beauty; You are meekness; You are security;
You are inner peace; You are joy; You are our hope and joy; You are justice; You are moderation, You are all our riches.
[You are enough for us].
5. You are beauty, You are meekness; You are the protector,
You are our guardian and defender;
You are strength; You are refreshment.
6. You are our hope, You are our faith, You are our charity,
You are all our sweetness,
You are our eternal life:
Great and wonderful, Lord.
God almighty, Merciful Savior[1]

Clare, likewise, is just as enthralling where she says:

2. Place your mind before the mirror of eternity!
Place your soul in the brilliance of glory.3f
Place your heart in the figure of the divine substance!4
And transform your whole being into the image of the Godhead Itself
through contemplation!5
So that you too may feel what His friends feel
as they taste the hidden sweetness
which God Himself has reserved
from the beginning
for those who love Him..[2]

 Saint Francis and Clare are a unique expression of early Middle Ages monastic. In a sense Francis carved out the physical nature of becoming like Christ in body, and Clare confirmed his vision in both practice and across genders.  Together they became a template for much of what would follow in mystic thought and practice in the Church for hundreds of years. 

Product Link: Francis and Clare: The Complete Works (The Classics of Western Spirituality)

Review by Kim Gentes

[1]Francis of Assisi & Clare of Assisi, “ Francis and Clare: The Complete Works”, (Mahwah, NJ:Paulist Press, 1982), Pg 100
[2]Ibid., Pg 200

Bernard of Clairvaux was the abbot of Clairvaux monastery (which he built and named) which is located in what is now Northeastern France.  Bernard’s writings, sermons and letters proved to be pivotal in the twelfth century. His particular devotional penchant for expounding the love of God invigorated monastic communities in his time, and provided a template for others to come, who would look back on this great Christian mystic.  Bernard, like other great minds in the history of the church, was intent on dissecting the components of the human soul. In his work you can see broad areas of focus, such as:  understanding our own humanity, explaining our penchant for sin, an exceptional treatise of love, and finally expressing a practical model for personal development when dealing with the aforementioned.  Like Gregory before him, much of his writing about our conscience, and internal conflicts led to a fairly comprehensive articulation of the soul and human psychological state.

Bernard focuses an extended amount of time and ink to the book of Song of Songs, where he expounds nearly all of his theories on the relationship of Christ (the Bridegroom) with the Church (his bride).  He is especially enamored with the concept and passage declaring “Let him kiss me with the kiss of his mouth”. He says:

But he, he of whom they speak, let him speak to me. Let him kiss me with the kiss of his mouth. Let him not speak to me in them or through them, for they are "a watery darkness, a dense cloud" (Ps 17: 12). But let him kiss me with the kiss of his mouth, whose gracious presence and eloquence of wonderful teaching causes a "spring of living . Water" to well up in me to eternal life an 4: 14). Shall I not find that a richer grace is poured out upon me from him whom the Father has anointed with the oil of gladness more than all his companions, if he will deign to kiss me with the kiss of his mouth (Ps 44:8)? His living . and effective word (Heb 4: 12) is a kiss; not a meeting of lips, which can sometimes be deceptive about the state of the heart, but a full infusion of joys, a revelation of secrets, a wonderful and inseparable mingling ) of the light from above and the mind on which it is shed, which, when it is joined with God, is one spirit with him (l Cor 6: I 7)..[1]

Perhaps Bernard’s most well-known work is a summarized teaching called the Four Levels of Love.  It explained his deep understanding of our souls and their progress to full union with God.   One of my favorite things about Bernard, however, was his perception of how sin is always looking for a way to corrupt love. He argues for clarity at every level of the person.  He says:

I am suspicious of love which seems to be prompted by hope of gain. It is weak if when hope is gone it either vanishes or diminishes. It is impure when it desires something else, other than the beloved. Pure love does not hope for gain. Pure love does not draw its strength from hope; nor is it weakened by mistrust.[2]

Bernard is not without his issues, however. Though love was that the center of his message, he will forever be remembered for being the outspoken voice to rally support for a crusade, the second Holy War, in the mid 1100’s.  He will be later credited, as well, with being one the strong initiators of the veneration of Mary.

Product Link: Bernard of Clairvaux: Selected Works (The Classics of Western Spirituality)

Review by Kim Gentes

[1]Gillian R. Evans, “Bernard of Clairvaux: Selected Works” in The Classics of Western Spirituality: A Libarary of the Great Spiritual Masters, translated Gillian r. Evans (Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1987), Pg 216
[2]Ibid., Pg 273