Golden Booklet of the True Christian Life - John Calvin (translated Henry J. Van Andel)
Were I to meet John Calvin today, I think he might be a surprisingly moderate but deeply spiritual Christian professor of warm wisdom and serious desire to see personal holiness take hold in the life of followers of Christ. This might seem obvious, but note what I did not say. I doubt that I would find a man who is so vehemently driven by the later (derived1) sectarian doctrine of TULIP that he would not sit in community with me as we discussed our varying understandings of theology. Where do I find such a wise and thoughtful Calvin? Where do I meet the great teacher who inscribed the systematic theology of the reformation that Martin Luther so profoundly burst forward with on the public of medieval Europe?
I meet this John Calvin in the heart of his writings of the Institute, at the sixth chapter, in book III, which was entitled by Calvin (after a number of revisions) as “On The Christian Life”. This section of his monumental treatise “Institutes of The Christian Religion” was also extracted and printed as a separate small volume called “The Golden Booklet”. In the pages of the “Golden Booklet of the True Christian Life“ (our later English title) we find the John Calvin who speaks with both fiery passion and tempered wisdom.
Calvin begins sharply enough, setting the terse tone of his writing and focused style which gets to the point almost surgically.
The goal of the new life is that God’s children exhibit melody and harmony in their conduct. What melody? The song of God’s justice. What harmony? The harmony between God’s righteousness and our obedience.2
No one can accuse Calvin of presenting an unrequited gospel. To the contrary, the Golden Book proceeds from point to point, blithely trampling on self-importance, false motives and hardness of heart to get the reader to see the reality of the gospel’s unmistakable call to the cross. He returns here repeatedly, helping us place our pride on the altar by examination of the cross :
Therefore, that we may not become haughty when we acquire wealth; that we may not become proud when we receive honors ; that we may not become insolent when we are blessed with prosperity and health, the Lord himself, as he deems fit, uses the cross to oppose, restrain, and subdue the arrogance of our flesh...This is the reason why we see different persons disciplined with different crosses. The heavenly Physician takes care of the well-being of all his patients; he gives some a milder medicine and purifies others by more shocking treatments, but he omits no one; for the whole world, without exception, is ill (Deut. 32:15).3
But John Calvin is more than just a naval gazing mystic. His profound grasp of the breadth of the Scriptural landscape helps him juxtapose his Imago Dei/creational theology (found in statements such as “The law of God contains in itself the dynamic of the new life by which his image is fully restored in us;”4 and “But Scripture here helps us out with an excellent argument when it teaches us that we must not think of man’s real value, but only of his creation in the image of God to which we owe all possible honor and love”5) with a theology of suffering, God’s will and predestination (“For adversity will always wound us with its stings. When we are afflicted with disease we shall, therefore, groan and complain and pray for recovery. When we are oppressed with poverty we shall feel lonely and sorry. When we are defamed, despised, and offended, likewise we shall feel restless. When we have to attend the funeral of our friends we shall shed tears. But we must always come back to this consolation: The Lord planned our sorrow, so let us submit to his will. Even in the throes of grief, groans, and tears, we must encourage ourselves with this reflection, so that our hearts may cheerfully bear up while the storms pass over our heads (John 21:18)”6).
Calvin’s writing here reminds us instantly of Thomas a Kempis’ “The Imitation of Christ”. Calvin’s Golden Book unearths the heart motivations, factors, deceptions and is always looking to bring the reader forward into a picture of our bleakness such that we will abandon hope of having anything useful within ourselves, save that which surrenders to Christ’s suffering discipline in our lives. Calvin whittles at our motivations of conscience and hearkens the glories of persecution. At one point, one might think he goes too far, even calling on God’s persecution so that the righteous may be more clearly vindicated:
Let the impious flourish in their riches and honors, and enjoy their so-called peace of mind. Let them boast of their splendor and luxury, and abound in every joy. Let them harass the children of light with their wickedness, let them insult them with their pride, let them rob them by their greed, let them provoke them with their utter lawlessness...For, according to Paul, it is a righteous thing with God to award punishment to them that trouble the saints, and to give rest to those who are troubled, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven. This is our only consolation.7
While I admire Calvin’s pursuit of holiness, this declaration reads like a prayer asking for evil to come upon Christians so that they might be “accounted as sheep for the slaughter,” as he says earlier in the text. It seems doubly bad that he then says that our comfort should come on this point- the hope that others will get punished for having caused us trouble. Calvin misreads Paul, or at the least, adds his own vestige of a 16th century bloodless martyr teaching into Paul’s original text.
But Calvin is far too great a theologian and writer to leave us with a blighted aftertaste. His transcendent understandings of God’s grace and especially his mandates to a vocational calling on human beings (again rooted in his belief in the Imago Dei) lift up the highest of Calvin’s brilliance:
Finally we should note that the Lord commands every one of us in all the actions of our life to be faithful in our calling. For he knows that the human mind burns with restlessness, that it is swept easily hither and thither, and that its ambition to embrace many things at once is insatiable. Therefore, to prevent that general confusion being produced by our folly and boldness, he has appointed to everyone his particular duties in the different spheres of life. And, that no one might rashly go beyond his limits, he has called such spheres of life vocations, or callings. Every individual’s sphere of life, therefore, is a post assigned him by the Lord that he may not wander about in uncertainty all the days of his life....And everyone in his respective sphere of life will show more patience, and will overcome the difficulties, cares, miseries, and anxieties in his path, when he will be convinced that every individual has his task laid upon his shoulders by God. If we follow our divine calling, we shall receive this unique consolation that there is no work so mean and so sordid that does not look truly respectable and highly important in the sight of God (Coram Deo!) (Gen. 1:28; Col. 1:1 ff)!8
Not only is this profound wisdom but it rings of Calvin’s glorious assignment of God’s goodness into our humanity. This is very interesting, since later proponents of strong “Calvinist” doctrine would nearly eviscerate this high valuing of humanity using the hyper TULIP conflagration of the doctrine of total depravity.
Reading the Golden Book is an eye-opening and encouraging look into a more personal, pastoral Calvin, whose wisdom never leaves him, and his sense of care for the soul is always on fire.
Product Link on Amazon: Golden Booklet of the True Christian Life
Review by
Kim Gentes
[1]Calvin didn’t create the 5 point doctrine of Calvinism himself. It was assembled later (50 years beyond his death) by adherents of Calvin’s teachings at the Synod of Dort in 1619 as a mechanism to combat the divergent understandings of Jacob Arminias (from whose namesake and teachings was derived the doctrines of Arminianism)
[2]John Calvin, “Golden Booklet of the True Christian Life”, translated Henry J. Van Andel (Grand Rapids, MI:Baker Books, 1952), Pg 15
[3]Ibid., Pg 55
[4]Ibid., Pg 15
[5]Ibid., Pg 37
[6]Ibid., Pg 64
[7]Ibid., Pg 79
[8]Ibid., Pg 92-93
Reader Comments (5)
If you choose to be known by the name or guided by the philosophy of one who delighted in burning at the stake any who met with his self justifying disapproval - I do not. To suppose that taking seriously anything that comes from the pen of one who was a serial killer, and proud of it, is a stretch too far for myself. "By this shall all men know that you are My disciples, that you shall be called Calvinists, Arminianists, (fill in your self chosen blank)." I have no doubts that Calvin was an excellent politician, theologian, and leader. I just don't believe that I can find any evidence that he was a practicing disciple of Jesus, the Christ; that is at least, if you believe that the practice of Christianity includes following Christs commands.
Beres,
I agree that some of what we find in Calvin (and indeed many leaders lives) provides us the opportunity for criticism from afar. The facts are in for their lives, and we can indeed judge them, if we so chose. All accounts has it that he incited or agreed to the deaths of Michael Servetus, Jacques Gruet and perhaps others. The description of his fervor lacks a number of moral barriers including anti-semitism and other evils.
No doubt we can stand in piercing judgment of these, but we can only do so if we see that we may also be in danger of discounting the good, and positive contribution that God may have been using him to deliver.
We also have to ignore that despite the evilness of his sin, God himself deals with every man according to his mercy, not ours. Without ignoring sin, God dealt with such evil as murder (David), racism (Peter/and the apostles), adultery (David, the woman caught in adultery), and even the murder, false capture, accusation and condemning God himself to death (Jesus prayed for the forgiveness of those who crucified him).
Finally in condemning a person that God may have called to contribute to our history (John Calvin) as irredeemable or of little practical use, we need to also condemn ourselves of all the depths of sin, adultery (Jesus said lusting after a woman in your heart is adultery), murder (Jesus said hating your brother is murder) and whatever fully manifested sins we have engaged in are also being fully condemned as irredeemable by the God of mercy.
Does this mean we need to be proud of Calvin's public sins (or private for that matter)? Absolutely not. But it does mean that we have to acknowledge our real history, not the sanitized one we'd like to serve up to the generations that follow, hoping they will only see the phony "clean" picture of our story as the historic church. Our history has pain, sin and nearly as much destruction within its community as without. But it also has much joy, and within its bosom is the message of Christ, his cross, resurrection and the hope of nations.
I don't blame you for judging Calvin, but if you wish to judge, you can't stop there. You must see all church history, including your part in it, as the canvas on which to write your judgments. We certainly cannot condone or emulate such sin as Calvin (indeed as many church leaders in history) engaged in. But we must learn both of the good fruit and bad fruit of their lives. To do so, you must look properly at the entirety of a man's life, not just the well publicized sins.
Sincerely,
Kim
Kim, respectfully your position must be corrected. Jesus says that we are to know people by their fruit. Writing books is not fruit. King Saul, Solomon or others have earned their place in history and we recognize that without being judgmental.
Having the ability to espouse doctrine does not make one a Christian. It is both doctrine and character that must be added up for a good Christian testimony. It is our duty to distance ourselves from people that failed miserably at leadership and this is not denying history. Calvin persecuted anabaptists - I probably would've been among them avoiding Geneva.
Let's not mud the waters and call Christians those that bring fruit contrary to the word and Spirit of Christ.
In fact, "FLORIN' Jesus said nothing of the kind. When He made that statement, he was talking about false prophets. This is unmistakably clear from His contextual words. So hows about some good "Christians" holding all those televangelists accountable for their prophecies that never came true? All those Hal Lindsay's, Benny Hinns and the rest? NO? I didn't think so!
Sometimes it's not so much what we agree or disagree about that qualifies the fruit in the life but the spirit and context of how we treat each other in the intercourse of our convictions and passions.
I have enjoyed the dialog here and in this case the messengers are ultimately more important than their said messages. Take care all.